Marriage at the Speed of LOVE
"Whose Desire Turns", mixed media by Tim Holmes |
I come
from a long line of married couples. As far
back as records go, there are no divorces until I come along and
ruined the whole picture! Not because I didn't dedicate myself to it; I
thought my marriage would last forever, but I was only together with my
wife for 20 years. What happened that I destroyed the family record?
Well,
three things. First– as my Ex will
freely attest– I'm an idiot. But what about my sister and
cousins who also got divorced? Are we all so inept? Well, another
reason may be that ours is the first generation for whom
marriage is not primarily an economic partnership. It is a grand
luxury to be able to choose to marry as a matter of preference rather
than survival. You would think that this change would produce some
attitude of curiosity about the structure of one of the most central of
our institutions carried forward from pre-history, but save for a few
adjustments of vows– like when
Christianity was invented– marriage itself has seen little
re-evaluation. I suggest now's the time and that is because of the third
reason: the increasing pace of change.
A
50-year marriage for the next generation will be very different from
that of my grandparents. My grandad grew up without electricity on a
Pennsylvania farm that in fact was not much different than any farm of,
say, 100 or even 1000 years earlier! When he went off to college he was
introduced to three new experiences: he drove a
car, used a telephone and– get this– heard live music for the first
time! His lifetime encompassed a lot of world changes, but nothing like
the pace of changes my niece will experience. Tara was born into a house
without cell phones, but now– 9 years later– everyone in her family has
one and wouldn't give them up. The speed of change has and will
continue to increase exponentially. Will marriage adjust?
I
suggest marriage is something like a wild animal– we want to live with
it because of its mystery and power, but like a wild animal it is
dynamic and unpredictable. The old marriage model is something like
keeping a tiger by surrounding it by the iron bars of solid vows to keep
it safely enclosed. Unfortunately the measure of success
becomes whether or not the tiger ever got away, not whether it is
actually still alive in there! For
times of rapid change it appears we need a new model for marriage.
I
suggest one based on a different metaphor; that of a falconer. This is a
person who also
keeps a wild animal. Perhaps to the horror of the tiger trainer,
however, every
day the falconer lets her beast go free! But her wild critter keeps
coming
back home. This is because what the falconer is focused on: anticipating
and satisfying any need that arises for her charge. I intend to point
out this crucial difference to Tara when she grows up and thinks about
marriage (if my generation hasn't totally ruined the idea for her). You
can't say
“Get your own damn blanket!” to a falcon because it may never return.
The falconer focuses
not on keeping the animal at all costs, but on cultivating and
facilitating healthy growth, in whatever direction that leads. Every
day the wild falcon returns by choice precisely because it knows that
whatever excitement it encounters, there is
no place in the wide world that it will be better loved and cared for
than right here, at
home!
thank you, tim. wonderful reflection on how the institution of marriage fails us as we are encouraged to grow or to live as if already dead.... unless that is we have been wise to marry the one who grows with us... in this case, the institution is not the want and, thus, no matter.
ReplyDelete